« The Stranger within my gate.. | Main | Innocent until proved guilty »

Helmet Danger

BBC NEWS | England | Somerset | Wearing helmets 'more dangerous'

Cyclists who wear protective helmets are more likely to be knocked down by passing vehicles, new research from Bath University suggests.

The study found drivers tend to pass closer when overtaking cyclists wearing helmets than those who are bare-headed.

Dr Ian Walker was struck by a bus and a lorry during the experiment. He was wearing a helmet both times.

But the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents said tests have shown helmets protect against injuries.

To carry out the research, Dr Walker used a bike fitted with a computer and an ultrasonic distance sensor to find drivers were twice as likely to get close to the bicycle, at an average of 8.5cm, when he wore a helmet...

"This study shows that when drivers overtake a cyclist, the margin for error they leave is affected by the cyclist's appearance.

"By leaving the cyclist less room, drivers reduce the safety margin that cyclists need to deal with obstacles in the road, such as drain covers and potholes, as well as the margin for error in their own judgements.

"We know helmets are useful in low-speed falls, and so definitely good for children, but whether they offer any real protection to somebody struck by a car is very controversial.

"Either way, this study suggests wearing a helmet might make a collision more likely in the first place,"

To test another theory, Dr Walker donned a long wig to see whether there was any difference in passing distance when drivers thought they were overtaking what appeared to be a female cyclist.

While wearing the wig, drivers gave him an average of 14cm more space when passing.

In future research, Dr Walker hopes to discover whether this was because female riders are seen as less predictable than male riders or because women are not seen riding bicycles as often as men on the UK's roads.

8.5 cm? That's less than a hand's breadth if my reading of a ruler is correct. I tell you if anyone gets within 8.5 feet of me a cycle back the hill tonight from the pub with my Lee Metford strapped to my back they can expected scratched paintwork at the very least.


What a load of shite (the article quoted) perhaps Dr Ian Walker should learn how to open his eyes and cycle properly to avoid being hit by ENORMOUS vehicles ... sigh.

I think by the second time I had been hit by a large vehicle the bike would be in the shed and I would be commuting via range rover.
what a knob.

I read it that they were a hands breadth closer on average not a hands breadth away on average. Therefore as you point out handly any difference at all but a difference never the less.

Possibly people gave him more space as men in lab coats and wigs make them nervous.

ElizaF could you share with us this magical system you have for "avoiding" things that are moving faster than you and are coming up from behind you.

Sounds to good to be true.

Being both a driver and a cyclist and having been knocked off twice in 6 months by so called professional taxi drivers in london I fear no amount of Hi Viz and lights helps. Lets face it they are cunts along with most of the bus drivers! Still I prefer to cycle through london than use the tube or bus!

Aye I certainly can, I don't get in their bloody way in the first place. Odd little habit but I find it works.

Post a comment