« Gordon and Jacqboots ID Card Claims Shredded | Main | Wussies on the High Seas »

Back to the Stone Age as the storm rages

Snow blankets London for Global Warming debate - first October Snow in over 70 years ォ Watts Up With That?

Snow fell as the House of Commons debated Global Warming yesterday - the first October fall in the metropolis since 1922. The Mother of Parliaments was discussing the Mother of All Bills for the last time, in a marathon six hour session.

In order to combat a projected two degree centigrade rise in global temperature, the Climate Change Bill pledges the UK to reduce its carbon dioxide emissions by 80 per cent by 2050....

n the Commons, there wasn’t an out-and-out sceptic to be found. It was 90 minutes before anyone broke the liturgy of virtue. When Peter Lilley, in amazement, asked why there hadn’t been a cost/benefit analysis made of such a major change in policy, he was told to shut up by the Deputy Speaker.

(And even Lilley - one of only five out of 653 MPs to vote against the Climate Bill in its second reading - felt it necessary to pledge his allegiance to the Precautionary Principle.)

It fell to a paid-up member of Greenpeace, the Labour MP Rob Marris, to point out the Bill was a piece of political showboating that would fail. “The public will ask ‘why should we bother doing anything at all?’”

Tory barrister Christopher Chope professed himself baffled by the logic of including aviation and shipping. If transportation was made more expensive, how could there be more trade?

“As we destroy industry we’ll be more dependent on shipping and aviation for our imports!” he said.

“When the history books come to be written people will ask why were the only five MPs… who voted against this ludicrous bill,” he said. It would tie Britain up in knots for years, all for a futile gesture, Chope thought.

However, Tim Yeo, the perma-suntanned Tory backbencher who wants us to carry carbon rationing cards, said it would “improve Britain’s competitiveness”. He didn’t say how.

Can anyone explain to me what the point of a Yeo is? It seems to be neither decorative, useful or necessary, or do we have to keep a Yeo around like one is obliged to keep an incontinent pet around out of sentiment? If so isn't it time to call the vet before the Yeo and its other equally dumb friends do further damage to the furnishings and fittings.

Comments

Never mind Yeo, what about the Tory Party in general. In 11 years as an opposition have they opposed anything of significance?

With another cold winter on the way in the Northern Hemisphere with the probable continiuing cooling of the planet we set for an emperor's new clothes moment in the not too distant future for all the AGW alarmist acolytes - I can't wait. Just hope they don't do too much damage in the meantime

Post a comment