« Nice Work If You Can Get It | Main | Hattersley - at best patronising and at worst denigrating. »

RA-1O Final Investigation Report Involving Dr. Michael E, Mann The Pennsylvania State University

RA-1O Final Investigation Report Involving Dr. Michael E, Mann
The Pennsylvania State University
June 4, 2010

(Mirror Site)

(The) level of success in proposing research, and obtaining funding to conduct it, clearly places Dr. Mann among the most respected scientists in his field. Such success would not have been possible had he not met or exceeded the highest standards of his profession for proposing research.
The Investigatory Committee established that Dr. Mann, in all of his published studies, precisely identified the source(s) of his raw data and, whenever possible, made the data and or links to the data available to other researchers.
Most questions about Dr. Mann's findings have been focused on his early published work that showed the "hockey stick" pattern of climate change. In fact, research published since then by Dr. Mann and by independent researchers has shown patterns similar to those first described by Dr. Mann, although Dr. Mann's more recent work has shown slightly less dramatic changes than those reported originally. In some cases, other researchers (e.g., Wahl & Ammann, 2007) have been able to replicate Dr. Mann's findings, using the publicly available data and algorithms. The convergence of findings by different teams of researchers, using different data sets, lends further credence to the fact that Dr. Mann's conduct of his research has followed acceptable practice within his field.
... All of these awards and recognitions, as well as others not specifically cited here, serve as evidence that his scientific work, especially the conduct of his research, has from the beginning of his career been judged to be outstanding by a broad spectrum of scientists. Had Dr. Mann's conduct of his research been outside the range of accepted practices, it would have been impossible for him to receive so many awards and recognitions, which typically involve intense scrutiny from scientists who mayor may not agree with his scientific conclusions.
Moreover, Dr. Mann's work on the Third Assessment Report (2001) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change received recognition (along with several hundred other scientists) by being awarded the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize. Clearly, Dr. Mann's reporting of his research has been successful and judged to be outstanding by his peers.
The Investigatory Committee considers Dr. Mann's actions in sharing unpublished manuscripts with third parties, without first having received express consent from the authors of such manuscripts, to be careless and inappropriate. While sharing an unpublished manuscript on the basis of the author's implied consent may be an acceptable practice in the judgment of some individuals, the Investigatory Committee believes the best practice in this regard is to obtain express consent from the author before sharing an unpublished manuscript with third parties.
The Investigatory Committee, after careful review of all available evidence, determined that there is no substance to the allegation against Dr. Michael E. Mann, Professor, Department of Meteorology, The Pennsylvania State University. More specifically, the Investigatory Committee determined that Dr. Michael E. Mann did not engage in, nor did he participate in, directly or indirectly, any actions that seriously deviated from accepted practices within the academic community for proposing, conducting, or reporting research, or other scholarly activities.
The decision of the Investigatory Committee was unanimous.

One teeny tiny slap on the wrist but otherwise it is so panegyric, such an eulogy, that even his mother might blush at having written it. He truly is a Mann amongst men.

I wonder if the Investigatory Committee would be interested in a bridge I have for sale...


So because Mann's circle of like-minded colleagues gave him a pat on the back it means he's a good chap and got awards. And because he got awards, he must be a good chap. Hmmm.

"All the awards and recognitions----"

Let us get him the Noble Peace Prize. He sounds like he deserves it more than BHO!

"All the awards and recognitions----"

Let us get him the Nobel Peace Prize. He sounds like he deserves it more than BHO!

They may not want the bridge but after that report they must be very short of whitewash. He certainly knew how to get grants for his dubious scare stories, but then remember "scares mean money". I have lost count of the number of scare stories with death counts from millions to hundreds of millions and up, never happened did they?

Post a comment