« Beddington - Use Disasters To Pass Green Laws | Main | Chris Huhne - Utter Cut »

The Twelfth - A Glorious Day to Celebrate Freedom

The Glorious Revolution is arguably the most significant single advance in the provision of good government that the world has ever seen. This has been overshadowed by concentrating on its quite peripheral impact on the divisions among Christians. But the Calvinist Prince of Orange who became William III was driven by his fear of absolutist French hegemony over Europe, not by worries about Catholicism whose leader, the Pope, was his temporal ally.

The point is that the freedoms ensured and the benefits gained from the Glorious Revolution far exceed anything gained from any other single event , including the mistakenly more celebrated French Revolution.

The Reign of Terror in the French Revolution was bad enough; but the loss of life from the resulting years of war which ended only in 1815 compares with the First World War, and that with a smaller population. The other great so called Revolution, the Russian, was more a coup d’état by the Bolsheviks, with equally disastrous imitations in Europe and Asia which led to the death of about 100 million.

The American Revolution was derivative and confirmatory of the Glorious Revolution.

The Glorious Revolution was in many ways England’s great gift to the world. It established those fundamental principles of good governance which best allow man to achieve and to exercise his fundamental rights.

It is of particular significance not only in the constitutional development of Britain and the Commonwealth, but also the United States.....

...since the Glorious Revolution, the Anglo-Americans have been on the winning side in every major international conflict. .

This indicates some advantage in the Anglo-Saxon system of governance. There is no evidence that this has anything to with race but rather, it is to do with the endorsement of what we may call political culture. Mead makes the point that not only is the United States a nation of immigrants, but so was England even at the time of the Glorious Revolution. This augurs well for the current massive immigration into the Anglo-Saxon countries. Good sense will make most realise that the system they have come to works and works well – the great majority will have little inclination to change it.

It is important to stress that the great advantages of the Glorious Revolution were not the result of some philosopher sitting down and designing them. That was what directed the French and Bolshevik Revolutions, near crazed men designing schemes to save the world that came close to ruining it. The style of the Anglo-Saxon is pragmatic; the style of the major continental powers has hitherto been more theoretical.

The wisdom of the Anglo Saxons has been in allowing institutions to evolve gradually over time and through trial and error. By way of contrast to continental thought, I would refer to the story of the French énarque who when the benefits of something we are familiar with were shown to him said: “Yes, it may well work in practice, but does it work in theory?” .....

Source - The Glorious Revolution: Three Centuries of Freedom David Flint


"There is no evidence that this has anything to with race but rather, it is to do with the endorsement of what we may call political culture. "

Sadly this seems so dated now that the ruling class has decided to join the continent, and import the world with no limitations.

I mean England took in "lots" of Huguenots: protestant, middle class, skilled and educated laborers who were visually indistinguishable from the natives( Prussia & Holland did too, and them and descendants made so much trouble for France for decades and decades that it wasn't funny, providing lots of officers, sergeants.... and lots of tax paying citizens) into a land of laissez faire and no social safety net that was not defined as "Church of X". Now we're getting muslims, and in the US mexicans, what could go wrong?

"This augurs well for the current massive immigration into the Anglo-Saxon countries."

Oh, yeah?

Back in the 17th century, how many of those immigrants were from a totally alien culture, determined to ghettoise themselves and never to integrate; intended to overthrow the existing English legal system in favour of dark-ages brutality; openly planned sedition against their new home; or were simply freeloaders with nothing to contribute except an outstretched palm?

I'm guessing none.

Post a comment