What a 2.2 in History From Cambridge Tells Us
With that lack of logic and knowledge, (do I need to mention opportunity costs of actions?), I feel a Desmond was generous.
An Englishman's Castle
Bashing Bogusmongers from behind the barbed wire.
« Paddy Eurodown | Main | Friday Night is Music Night (Working This Weekend Edition) »
With that lack of logic and knowledge, (do I need to mention opportunity costs of actions?), I feel a Desmond was generous.
Comments
"...a point one percent chance is only one in ten thousand..."
I'm guessing he did history because maths was too hard.
Posted by: Frank | September 16, 2011 9:22 AM
So. We should spend multiple trillions of (whatever currency you care to choose) because there might (or might not) be a 1 in 10,000 chance (by his strange mathematics) of CAGW being correct?
None of these nutters seem to have picked up on Pielke Sr.'s concept of saying:
What are the hazards?
What can/should we do to counter those hazards (at a tiny fraction of the multiple trillions)?
But, then, making/keeping the world fit for humans and other life was never the Green objective.
Posted by: Alan Bates | September 16, 2011 11:26 AM
Pascals wager for the win.
Posted by: Pascal | September 17, 2011 1:44 AM
Pascal, I feel I love you just for that comment!
Posted by: Poosh | September 17, 2011 2:20 AM